El uso de drones en seguridad y defensa: impactos y retos para el cumplimiento del DIH y la protección de los derechos humanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25062/1900-8325.4905Palabras clave:
conflictos armados, derecho internacional humanitario, derechos humanos, drones, seguridad global, tecnologías disruptivasResumen
The article explores the impact and challenges of the use of drones in security and defense, focusing on compliance with International Humanitarian Law and the protection of Human Rights. It describes the technological advances of the 20th and 21st century, highlighting how connectivity and modern technology have transformed armed conflicts. Through the case studies of Syria and Ukraine, the operational advantages of drone use are examined. However, it also addresses critical challenges, including lack of accountability, dehumanization of targets, and potential normalization of IHL and HR violations. The article concludes with the need for improved transparency, accountability and ethical training of drone operators to ensure respect for international humanitarian norms.
Biografía del autor/a
Camilo Alberto Vargas Cano, Departamento Jurídico Integral del Ejército, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Magíster en Gestión Estratégica del Talento Humano, Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Colombia; Magíster en Contratación Estatal, Universidad de Medellín, Colombia; Magíster en Seguridad y Defensa Nacional, Escuela Superior de Guerra de Colombia; Magíster en Alta Dirección de Empresas, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, España; abogado, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Colombia, y administrador de empresas, Universidad Politécnica Gran Colombiana, Colombia.
Juan Fernando Gil-Osorio, Departamento Jurídico Integral del Ejército, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Candidato a Doctor en Derecho, Universidad Externado de Colombia. Magíster en Derechos Humanos y Democratización, Universidad Externado de Colombia y Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Abogado, Universidad de Medellín. Investigador Junior reconocido y categorizado por Minciencias. Par académico del Consejo Nacional de Acreditación (CNA). Miembro de la Academia Colombiana de Derecho Internacional.
Jonnathan Jimenez-Reina, Escuela Superior de Guerra "General Rafael Reyes Prieto", Colombia
Candidato a Doctor en Seguridad Internacional, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia – UNED, España. Magíster en Seguridad y Defensa Nacionales, y en Derechos Humanos y Derecho Internacional de los Conflictos Armados, Escuela Superior de Guerra “General Rafael Reyes Prieto”, Colombia. Profesional en Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Colombia. Investigador Asociado reconocido y categorizado por Minciencias. Docente Ocasional Escuela Superior de Guerra “General Rafael Reyes Prieto”.
Referencias bibliográficas
Anderson, K. (2013). The case for drones (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2047537). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2047537
Antonova, M., & Ezzor, D. (n.d.). Russian mercenaries, a secretive weapon in Syria. The Times of Israel. https://tinyurl.com/2y4en3t5
Armour, C., & Ross, J. (2017). The health and well-being of military drone operators and intelligence analysts: A systematic review. Military Psychology, 29(2), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000149
Atkinson, C. (2018). Hybrid warfare and societal resilience: Implications for democratic governance. Information & Security, 39(1), 63-76.
Ayamga, M., Akaba, S., & Nyaaba, A. A. (2021). Multifaceted applicability of drones: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120677
Baines, D., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2020). Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic. Discussion Papers, Article 20-06. https://ideas.repec.org/p/bir/birmec/20-06.html
Banks, W. (2014). Cyber espionage, surveillance, and international law: Finding common ground. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2558155
Bermejo Garcia, R., & Cocchini, A. (2020). The drones under international humanitarian law (IHL). Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, 36, 27.
Bernal-Castro, C. A., & Moya-Vargas, M. F. (2018). Principios del derecho internacional humanitario (DIH). In C. A. Bernal-Castro, M. F. Moya-Vargas, J. Carvajal-Martínez & M. Tirado-Acero (Eds.), Derecho internacional humanitario en el conflicto armado colombiano (pp. 153-214). Universidad Católica de Colombia. https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23070
Bevacqua, G., Cacace, J., Finzi, A., & Lippiello, V. (2015). Mixed-initiative planning and execution for multiple drones in search and rescue missions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 25, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v25i1.13700
Broussard, G., Rubenstein, L. S., Robinson, C., Maziak, W., Gilbert, S. Z., & DeCamp, M. (2019). Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: A systematic review. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0063-x
Brown, L. (1999). Technical and military imperatives: A radar history of World War 2. CRC Press.
Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2015). Toward a drone accountability regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(1), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679414000732
Chávez, K. (n.d.). Learning on the fly: Drones in the Russian-Ukrainian war. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://tinyurl.com/26ywo4wc
Chávez, K., & Swed, O. (2023). Emulating underdogs: Tactical drones in the Russia-Ukraine war. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(4), 592-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2257964
Coeckelbergh, M. (2013). Drones, information technology, and distance: Mapping the moral epistemology of remote fighting. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9313-6
Crosston, M. (2020). Cyber colonization: The dangerous fusion of artificial intelligence and authoritarian regimes. Cyber, Intelligence, and Security Journal, 4(1), 149-171.
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). (2024). National security memorandum on critical infrastructure security and resilience (National Security Memorandum (NSM)). https://tinyurl.com/29e83gbr
De Swarte, T., Boufous, O., & Escalle, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence, ethics and human values: The cases of military drones and companion robots. Artificial Life and Robotics, 24(3), 291-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-019-00525-1
Díaz Galán, E. C. (2022). The Ukraine war and international humanitarian law: Chronicle of a war foretold. Tiempo de Paz, 146/147, 66-73.
Enemark, C. (2013). Armed drones and the ethics of war. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107218
Enemark, C. (2020). On the responsible use of armed drones: The prospective moral responsibilities of states. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(6), 868-888. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1690464
Fernández Pastor, B. (2017). The international regulation of drone use in armed conflicts: Their use by the United States in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Fischer, E. A. (2014). Cybersecurity issues and challenges: In brief. Congressional Research Service. https://a51.nl/sites/default/files/pdf/R43831.pdf
Gil Osorio, J. F., Vargas Cano, C. A., & Gil Osorio, M. Y. (2023). Los drones y su uso en la investigación criminal. In M. M. Bustamante Rua, M. d. P. Henao Ochoa, & D. M. Ramírez Carvajal (Eds.), La justicia en la era de la revolución tecnológica. Institución Universitaria de Envigado and Red para el Estudio del Proceso y la Justicia.
Gómez De Ágreda, Á. (2020). Ethics of autonomous weapons systems and its applicability to any AI systems. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101953
Gregory, S. (2019). Cameras everywhere revisited: How digital technologies and social media aid and inhibit human rights documentation and advocacy. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 11(2), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huz022
Guacaneme Medina, S. (n.d.). Fugas de información en el ciberespacio, una nueva amenaza para los Estados. Retrieved May 28, 2024, from https://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/handle/10654/39575
Hacker, B. C. (2005). The machines of war: Western military technology 1850-2000. History and Technology, 21(3), 255-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341510500198669
Hannas, W. C., & Tatlow, D. K. (2020). China’s quest for foreign technology: Beyond espionage. Routledge.
Hartcup, G., & Lovell, B. (2016). The effect of science on the Second World War. Springer.
Heller, K. J. (2013). “One hell of a killing machine”: Signature strikes and international law. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 11(1), 89-119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs093
Hernández, F. (2021). Ciberterrorismo y hacktivismo, subversión y desestabilización en el siglo XXI. Nov., 77-109.
Hijazi, A., Ferguson, C. J., Richard Ferraro, F., Hall, H., Hovee, M., & Wilcox, S. (2019). Psychological dimensions of drone warfare. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1285-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9684-7
Hirblinger, A. T., Wählisch, M., Keator, K., McNaboe, C., Duursma, A., Karlsrud, J., Sticher, V., Verjee, A., Kyselova, T., Kwaja, C. M. A., & Perera, S. (2024). Forum: Making peace with uncertainty: Reflections on the role of digital technology in peace processes beyond the data hype. International Studies Perspectives, 25(2), 185-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekad004
Howse, D. (1993). Radar at sea: The Royal Navy in World War 2. Springer.
Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos (Ed.). (2010). Ciberseguridad: Retos y amenazas a la seguridad nacional en el ciberespacio. Ministerio de Defensa.
Jiménez-Reina, J., Reyes Pulido, O. L., & Acosta Guzmán, H. M. (2023). Desafíos del derecho internacional humanitario en conflictos de guerra híbrida. Jurídicas CUC, 19(1), 635-666. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.19.1.2023.22
Joachim, J., & Schneiker, A. (2018). Private security and identity politics: Ethical hero warriors, professional managers and new humanitarians. Routledge.
Joerden, J. C. (2018). Dehumanization: The ethical perspective. In W. Heintschel Von Heinegg, R. Frau, & T. Singer (Eds.), Dehumanization of warfare (pp. 55-73). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67266-3_4
Johnston Huntington, T., & Eckert, A. E. (2022). "We watched his whole life unfold... Then you watch the death": Drone tactics, operator trauma, and hidden human costs of contemporary wartime. International Relations, 36(4), 638-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178221135036
Joinet, L. (1997). Question of the impunity of perpetrators of human rights violations (civil and political): Revised final report. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/245520
Kardasz, P., & Doskocz, J. (2016). Drones and possibilities of their using. Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-784X.1000233
Kasachkoff, T., & Kleinig, J. (2018). Drones, distance, and death. In G. J. Andreopoulos, R. L. Barberet, & M. K. Nalla (Eds.), The rule of law in an era of change (pp. 15-45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89908-4_2
Kaska, K., Beckvard, H., & Minárik, T. (2019). Huawei, 5G and China as a security threat. NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Center for Excellence (CCDCOE), 28, 1-26.
Kim, S.-K., Cheon, S.-P., & Eom, J.-H. (2019). A leading cyber warfare strategy according to the evolution of cyber technology after the fourth industrial revolution. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 9(40), 72-80.
Kohn, S., Cohen, M., Johnson, A., Terman, M., Weltman, G., & Lyons, J. (2024). Supporting ethical decision-making for lethal autonomous weapons. Journal of Military Ethics, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2024.2366094
Konert, A., & Balcerzak, T. (2021). Military autonomous drones (UAVs)—From fantasy to reality. Legal and ethical implications. Transportation Research Procedia, 59, 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.11.121
Kreps, S., & Zenko, M. (2014). The next drone wars; Preparing for proliferation. Foreign Affairs, 93, 68.
Kunertova, D. (2023). Drones have boots: Learning from Russia’s war in Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(4), 576-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2262792
Lai, A. K. (2021). The Cold War, the space race, and the law of outer space: Space for peace. Routledge.
Larkin, S. P. (2016). The age of transparency: International relations without secrets. Foreign Affairs, 95(3), 136-146.
Lasconjarias, G., & Maged, H. (2019). Fear the drones: Remotely piloted systems and non-state actors in Syria and Iraq. IRSEM, École Militaire, 1-20.
Laurent, A. (2023). The influence of international humanitarian law in peacemaking: An analysis of the role of IHL during the negotiations between the FARC-EP and the Government of Juan Manuel Santos in Colombia. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-507105
Layton, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence, big data and autonomous systems along the Belt and Road: Towards private security companies with Chinese characteristics? Autonomous Systems, and Warfare, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2020.1743483
Lee, Y. U. (2020). A study on the effective military use of drones. Journal of Information and Security, 20(4), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.33778/kcsa.2020.20.4.061
Lewis, L. L., & Vavrichek, D. M. (2016). Rethinking the drone war: National security, legitimacy, and civilian casualties in U.S. counterterrorism operations. Government Printing Office.
Mahadevan, P. (2010). The military utility of drones. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-006253833
Mehandru, N., & Koenig, A. (2018). ICTs, social media, & the future of human rights. Duke Law & Technology Review, 17, 129.
Montero Moncada, L. A., Jiménez Reina, J., & Ardila Castro, C. A. (2023). Efectos geopolíticos de la guerra de Ucrania. Novum Jus, 17(1), 205-235. https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2023.17.1.9
NATO Review - Autonomous military drones: No longer science fiction. (2017, July 28). NATO Review. https://tinyurl.com/2d6o8a2g
Ndi, G. (2015). Legal challenges of combating terrorism: International humanitarian law implications of ‘signature strikes’ by drones. 1-26. https://www.hud.ac.uk/news/
Nestoras, A. (2018). Political warfare: Competition in the cyber era. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 4427-4436). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622490
Nikolic, N. (2018). Connecting conflict concepts: Hybrid warfare and Warden’s rings. Information & Security: An International Journal, 41, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.4102
Niyitunga, E. B. (2023). Armed drones and international humanitarian law. Digital Policy Studies, 1(2), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.36615/dps.v1i2.2278
Phelps, L. C. W. (2021). On killing remotely: The psychology of killing with drones. Hachette UK.
Qureshi, W. A. (2019). Fourth- and fifth-generation warfare: Technology and perceptions. San Diego International Law Journal, 21(1), 187-216.
Rawat, R., Mahor, V., Chirgaiya, S., & Garg, B. (2021). Artificial cyber espionage-based protection of technological enabled automated cities infrastructure by dark web cyber offender. In F. Al-Turjman, A. Nayyar, A. Devi, & P. K. Shukla (Eds.), Intelligence of things: AI-IoT based critical applications and innovations (pp. 167-188). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82800-4_7
Reyes Pulido, O. L. (2022). Enemigo invisible. In J. F. Gil-Osorio & L. F. Ortega-Guzmán (Eds.), Cine, derecho operacional, derecho internacional humanitario y derechos humanos. Sello Editorial ESMIC. https://doi.org/10.21830/9786289514643
Reyes Pulido, O. L. (2023). Amenaza híbrida y tecnologías disruptivas: Escenario de desafíos para el derecho internacional humanitario. In C. A. Vargas Cano & J. F. Gil Osorio (Eds.), Reflexiones contemporáneas: Derecho internacional público y tecnologías disruptivas. Lijursánchez. Editorial Jurídica Sánchez R. S.A.S.
Rondeaur, C. (2019). Decoding the Wagner Group: Analyzing the role of private military security contractors in Russian proxy warfare.
Rossiter, A. (2023). Military technology and revolutions in warfare: Priming the drone debate. Defense & Security Analysis, 39(2), 253-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2023.2178500
Rothe, D. L., & Collins, V. E. (2014). The normality of political administration and state violence: Casuistry, law, and drones. Critical Criminology, 22(3), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-014-9234-7
Saini, R., Raju, V. K., & Chail, A. (2021). Cry in the sky: Psychological impact on drone operators. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 30(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.328782
Sassòli, M. (2024). International humanitarian law: Rules, controversies, and solutions to problems arising in warfare (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Saxon, D. (2016). Autonomous drones and individual criminal responsibility. In Drones and responsibility. Routledge.
Sengupta, R. (2023, February 27). Deconstructing Russia’s mysterious Wagner Group. Strategic News Global. https://tinyurl.com/2a459s3k
Sims, A. (2018). The rising drone threat from terrorists. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 19, 97.
Somali al-Shabab commanders "killed in drone strike." (2015, July 16). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-33550390
Somalia: US drone strike killed top Al-Shabab figure | Al-Shabab News | Al Jazeera. (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2024, from https://tinyurl.com/24e2fz3n
Sotoudehfar, S., & Sarkin, J. J. (2023). Drones on the frontline: Charting the use of drones in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict and how their use may be violating international humanitarian law. International and Comparative Law Review, 23(2), 129-169. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2023-0018
Special Report: Operation Inherent Resolve. (n.d.). U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/OIR/
Spiers, E. M. (2010). A history of chemical and biological weapons. Reaktion Books.
Thomas, T. (2020). Russian lessons learned in Syria. MITRE Center for Technology and National Security, June, 18, 1-27.
Vargas Cano, C. A., & Gil Osorio, J. F. (2023). Book review: Reflexiones contemporáneas: Derecho internacional público y tecnologías disruptivas. Estudios en Seguridad y Defensa, 18(36), 203-205. https://doi.org/10.25062/1900-8325.4837
Vargas Cano, C. A., Gil Osorio, J. F., & Jiménez-Reina, J. (2023). El papel de las empresas militares de seguridad privada en la guerra híbrida: análisis y perspectivas. In C. A. Vargas Cano & J. F. Gil Osorio (Eds.), Reflexiones contemporáneas: Derecho internacional público y tecnologías disruptivas. Lijursánchez. Editorial Jurídica Sánchez R. S.A.S.
Voice, M. (2022). Distance, proximity, and authenticity in the point of view of US military drone operator autobiographies. Discourse Studies, 24(6), 781-797. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221112274
Warfield, D. (2012). Critical infrastructures: IT security and threats from private sector ownership. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 21(3), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2011.652289
Warrior, L. C. (2015). Drones and targeted killing: Costs, accountability, and U.S. civil-military relations. Orbis, 59(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2014.11.008
WHO WE ARE. (n.d.). Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://www.inherentresolve.mil/WHO-WE-ARE/
Wyss, M. (2013). Arms transfers, neutrality and Britain’s role in the Cold War: Anglo-Swiss relations 1945-1958. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004234437
Yogev, H., Cohen, R. A., & Lewin, E. (2022). Revolution in military affairs—The Operation Mole Cricket 19 as a case study for the technological race during the Cold War. International Area Studies Review, 25(2), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/22338659221075806
Zinets, N. (2014, October 3). Ukrainian rebels keep up attacks on government-held airport in Donetsk. Reuters. https://tinyurl.com/25c2fmup
Cómo citar
Descargas
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Estudios en Seguridad y Defensa

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.











